Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorALBRIGHT, Jeremy J.en
dc.contributor.authorMAIR, Peteren
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-26T10:17:03Z
dc.date.available2014-03-26T10:17:03Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.citationElectoral Studies, 2011, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 858–864en
dc.identifier.issn1873-6890
dc.identifier.issn0261-3794
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/30577
dc.description.abstractExpert surveys are frequently used in comparative politics to measure the ideological locations of political parties. However, it is possible that increasing the number of parties to place systematically biases results as experts try to fit more actors onto a common space. We test this possibility with an experiment embedded in an “expert” survey – with graduate students serving as our pool of experts to ensure an adequate sample size – by varying the number of parties to be placed in the United Kingdom and Germany. We find some tendency for the variance of Labour and SPD placements to diminish when more parties are present, and for SPD placements to move toward the center given more parties. However, we find no consistent evidence that the number of parties systematically affects mean or median party placements. Our results support the reliability of expert surveys as an indicator of party ideology.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofElectoral Studies
dc.titleDoes the number of parties to place affect the placement of parties? Results from an expert survey experimenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.electstud.2011.09.001
dc.identifier.volume30
dc.identifier.startpage858
dc.identifier.endpage864
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue4


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record